honestly they should have just cancelled it rather than pass it around to different studios with shaky track records

  • Agent_Karyo@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    An earlier statement from one of the Paradox PR reps (before release):

    “I actually played Bloodlines 1 quite recently, and it is a good game, but it is also an old game, and there are many things that would not fly today,” Lilja said. "But I understand why people were super psyched by it in 2004, because it had a lot of cool [elements], and the feeling of being a vampire is really strong, regardless of other features. But I think people, they remember their feelings about it. And if they replayed it, I think they would see that it’s a competently good game by 2004 standards, now that it’s patched.

    Seems like their approach to Bloodlines 2 isn’t much of “high flyer” in the year 2025.

    In defence of the PR rep, they were open about Bloodlines 2 not having much to do with the original and that it was more of vampire themed linear action game.

    But in that case, why would you have internal targets of 2M+ initial sales if your plan is to have a radical departure from a well known cult classic RPG known for its roleplaying and strong writing?

    • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Not replying to you but to that statement, they’re absolutely wrong. I’ve never finished Bloodlines, life keeps getting in my way and I keep losing my save file (this is not unique to Bloodlines, there are several other games that are in the same bag). My point is every few years I start a new save on the OG bloodlines, and that game still holds out great, sure graphics are outdated, but other than that it’s a great game even by today standards, and while I haven’t played bloodlines 2, I’m fairly confident from everything I’ve seen it’s a worse game by every metric that matters. These people think that graphics can overcome anything, but that’s one of the least important parts of the game.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        To be fair, the first part of the game is by far the best. The unofficial patch adds back in a heckton of content in the late game, but even then, it feels sparse. I have very fond memories of exploring Santa Monica though. The game felt huge and exciting, even playing it for the first time in 2019.

        Damn, I should try install it again. I’m running Linux now, and if I recall, I had some problems getting it working. I should take another crack at it.

        • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          To be fair, the first part of the game is by far the best. The unofficial patch adds back in a heckton of content in the late game, but even then, it feels sparse.

          Maybe, I don’t know how far into the game I got since I never finished it. But I don’t think it ever felt empty… Although the damn zombie mission is one I hate and has made me quit the game in more than one occasion.

          I’m running Linux now

          I have been running Linux only for over a decade, so I can confidently say the game runs, and in Steam is just hit play.

          • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Were you running it with the unofficial patch? I don’t remember what it was that was causing me problems, but it’s possible that was it.