This is a great precedent to set.
It’s no different than property tax on a home.
Not quite as bad as property tax on a home, since that taxes the total value rather than just the difference between what you used to have and have now.
I’m just trying to get ahead of the inevitable propaganda that will inevitably act as if this will cause the end of civilization because it will disincentivize investors or some other dumb narrative.
It will definitely affect incentives, which is worth considering imo. With property taxes, there is some controversy, since someone can be forced to sell if their home value balloons past their income level, although it also has arguably positive effects like disincentivizing holding on to hoards of vancant properties and doing nothing with them.
I don’t really know exactly how it would go, but my first thought is people would sell stocks more readily and often, both because they need to in order to cover taxes, and because selling triggering capital gains wouldn’t be a thing to worry about anymore.
That’s honestly the best analogy I’ve heard for them.
I didn’t realize I had any money left


