• iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This community seems to think that bad things happening to bad people is uplifting, or that justice is uplifting. It doesn’t feel that way to me though.

    • vaguerant@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      There was a poll last month asking if politics and schadenfreude posts should be banned: https://lemmings.world/post/26744357

      The result was overwhelmingly yes: https://lemmy.world/post/30918729

      I’m not sure whether this story counts as either of those. Mods?

      Technically, the charges against X don’t sound “political” as such:

      The Paris Public Prosecutor’s Office has opened a criminal investigation into the platform. In the official filing, X stands accused of the “alteration of the functioning of an automated data processing system by an organized group” as well as the "fraudulent extraction of data from an automated data processing system by an organized group.”

      According to French newspaper Le Monde, these are considered “major computer hacking offenses,” which can carry sentences of up to 10 years in prison and a €300,000 (roughly $350,000) fine under French law.

      However, the purpose of X gaming the algorithm is almost certainly at least partially for political benefit. I think you could technically upvote this because you find it uplifting that sketchy big tech practices are facing pushback without enjoying it as schadenfreude, but personally this story doesn’t really feel “uplifting” to me.

      • ViscloReader@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 hours ago

        If fining one of the most influential social platform overseas that’s actively used to push propaganda isn’t political, idk what is

      • sga013@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Mods?

        still unsure on this one. it borders on schadenfreude, but for this one, the actions are being taken in a legal way, which is better.

        • huppakee@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I’d argue it’s different for an individual as oposed to a company as well. If it was ‘Country opens criminal investigation on Oil Company because of Nature Damage’ it wouldn’t be freude because of the schaden done to the oil company. But if the news was ‘CEO of Oil Company that caused Nature Damage’ I’d say that’s schadenfreude because the news is about a bad thing happening to a bad person.

          • sga013@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I do get your perspective, but one of the things that we (as the community) decided was that if something bad happening to bad folks will not be considered uplifting. There were many posts about a month ago, of similar nature to this, and then someone from community just made a rant post, to which we opened voting for. And since then, we have “discouraged” such posts.

            • huppakee@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I followed the discussion and agree schadenfreude is not uplifting and also believe its up to mods to make final decisions, just arguing why i think in this case this news is not very schadenfreude and not necessarily political anyway in an effort to convince you to not remove this post. I’m aware others feel different though.