• aaravchen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’ll never understand why privacy companies do this: sell a thoroughly mid-range phone for a flagship price. The privacy OS market in my experience is largely either tech nerds with enough cash to splash out on a new/second unnecessary device just so they can play around with trying to get the new OS working for themselves, until it eventually becomes their daily driver, or poor students who got a beat up phone from their friend’s cousin’s neighbor’s ex-girlfriend’s roommate and are slapping this alternative OS on it to use as their main with all consequences be damned. Obviously there are people in the middle there, but tjoses eem to be the two primary groups. So the bulk of people you’re selling to are those who want a higher end phone primarily, and probably would be willing to pay for it. Instead, they make a mid-range device that has low margins, often in small quantities because they throw in some niche feature that costs a ton to add to the existing design like a hardware kill switch, and then charge flagship phone prices for a mid-range device.

    • aaravchen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m willing to settle for having to buy a google pixel for instance (which is always a 2 year old design by the time it’s released), and wait a bit before it’s supported, but I’m never interested in a mid-range device. I dont care how much I support your mission, I’ll throw a couple hundred at you as a donation before I even consider that. And that’s assuming I’m buying the device at mid-range price. It’s out of the question that I’d ever pay flagship prices for it.

      Let me know when you have something that’s closer to a 3 year old flagship and we’ll talk, otherwise stop throwing your time and money at making a phone for a market that doesn’t exist.

  • St3alth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Correct me if I’m wrong but I thought eOS wasn’t trust worthy? I can’t remember why though but I remember reading something about why it wasn’t good to use

    • Fairgreen@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Nope that’s just FUD from certain other OS developers who are super toxic against literally everyone

    • Doorknob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I think that’s q bit overblown. You have an option to use a Murena account in place of a Google account. I just said no thanks and everything works perfectly fine with no services affected. In terms of security of privacy of the Murena account itself, no idea. Never used one.

    • djsaskdja@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      My understanding is that it just redirects all the data collection from Google to Murena. Like you’re just trading one corp for another. That’s why some people have an issue with it anyway. Especially since GrapheneOS exists. I take a slightly more nuanced view that a lot of the conveniences modern smartphone users take for granted rely on this type of backend infrastructure. It’s sort of hard to avoid if you value mainstream features. That may be sort of a controversial viewpoint though.

      • St3alth@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think that’s what I saw someone say somewhere the point about data being directed to murena, but I suppose it depends on how murena handles data and what privacy policy’s are in place. That’s what I think many people would look at before deciding whether to use it or not

  • First_Thunder@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Two things:

    -please let it have a processor meaningfully better than an A13 Bionic (the iPhone 11 processor, my current phone, a 6 year old chip at this point)

    • do Murena phones with eOS have the full play services API working?
    • aaravchen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I have bad news for you. From the specs on their site it appears to be a 6.5 inch FHD screen with a mid-range MediaTek processor. Really not much different from all the other mid-range phones offered in their site. For flagship price.

      Though to be fair to the project, you don’t need to buy a phone from them, you can re-inage an existing device bought elsewhere as long as it’s one of their supported models.

    • JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, it’s as paintful to use as a lineage os phone w microg (not a full implementation). If you want security and usability, use GrapheneOS.

        • JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          No AVB yellow state on most devices (bootloader relock with custom keys), MicroG (while actually a cool project) Isn’t a fully functional implementation (no Chromecast if you enjoy self harm, no U2F, FIDO authentication, etc.), you also can’t use safetynet (for banking apps) with unlocked bootloader

          • Fairgreen@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            15 hours ago

            This is actually incorrect, on almost all devices that Murena sells the bootloader is locked. I think you are confusing their official builds with their community/volunteer builds

            • JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Wow, so it’s actually somewhat decent. If I had money to actually choose a phone, I would still prefer GOS.

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            15 hours ago

            i use my browser for banking apps and i stopped using chromecast a decade or so ago.

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If it was cheaper than the competition in the googled Android space and was a foldable, I’d consider buying it.

    Just be aggressive with pricing and don’t be afraid of working with middlemen, since for example in Slovakia, people are used to shop via the green alien shop, because they can have student discounts, volume-based discounts for businesses, drop boxes, and more things that the manufacturer can’t afford to do.