The Free Software Foundation (FSF) today announced its project to bring mobile phone freedom to users. “Librephone” is an initiative to reverse-engineer obstacles preventing mobile phone freedom until its goal is achieved.

Librephone is a new initiative by the FSF with the goal of bringing full freedom to the mobile computing environment. The vast majority of software users around the world use a mobile phone as their primary computing device. After forty years of advocacy for computing freedom, the FSF will now work to bring the right to study, change, share, and modify the programs users depend on in their daily lives to mobile phones.

  • blobjim [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The project’s aim is to create an Android-compatible OS. I like the Linux-on-phone approach of postmarketOS better but whatever they end up working on should end up benefitting both projects since they’ll probably just be contributing driver code like postmarketOS. It’s weird that they don’t even mention postmarketOS in the announcement.

  • Bobo The Great@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Not a good choice for a name, at first I though it was just another linux phone that would be useless for 90% of people.

    Very cool project instead, hope this can lead the fondation for a 100% open source mobile OS.

    • EponymousBosh@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Honest to God, I thought a “Librephone” was something that already existed. I think I was thinking of the PinePhone or smth.

    • the_q@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Agree. Marketing isn’t really the in the wheelhouse of most Linux/open source projects.

          • non_burglar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            <gestures at all the enshittified software products from the last 30 years>

            In our current economic philosophy, yes.

            • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I think you mentioned a keyword you’re ignoring here: product. This enshittification happens in a commercial environment. Good marketing does not require a commercial product.

              • non_burglar@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Whatever it is you’re referring to here certainly doesn’t change the fact that the FSF sucks at marketing.

                • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  Which makes sense, since that is not what I was saying. I’m saying that a FOSS project with good marketing doesn’t necessarily become like google.

        • the_q@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          No I get that, and I agree for the most part, but do we want people outside our niche to use this stuff? If so then making it more palatable and accessible is important. Look at proton; it’s done amazing things for Linux adoption by lowering the fear factor that Linux has had for much of its life.

          • davetortoise@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            There’s a happy medium imo. Linux is enjoying a bit of a golden age at the moment because so many people are doing brilliant work making it usable and nice. But if the userbase becomes too large, tech companies will see their bottom lines affected, and it’ll be enshittified like everything else. And it’ll become a more attractive target for malware, of course.

  • majster@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I think this intiative is spot on. I would describe current approach of 2 major OS vendors, Google and Microsoft as such:

    Microsoft demands standardization at firmware level via UEFI, ACPI etc. because they bring OS kernel and userspace.

    Google demands Linux API version and brings just userspace.

    In theory Google approach better facilitates open ecosystem but each OEM treats Linux kernel as just a firmware blob so the end situation is actually worse.

    On the PC we have standardized firmware while Android chases Linux API levels each release and thus undermines the whole ecosystem.

  • iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 hours ago

    So they could do it for pixels and this open source firmware could be used by Graphene OS, for example?