• recklessengagement@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    That actually doesn’t sound bad.

    If I understand this correctly, its not about adding ID requirements. Its just about adding the functionality to every part of the software stack to go “oh, this is a kid, let’s not show them ads for adult apps or new stories about mass murder” etc etc.

    Less of a “papers, please” check, more of a robust “you must be this tall to ride” check.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Exactly, which is how I and many privacy respecting groups have been begging for it. We know the ultimate issue, they want nsfw off the internet. This shuts down the whole “it’s for the children” bs without us needing to give away who we are at all. This is the most sane way to age gate. , and they won’t be able to hide behind that excuse anymore.

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Except because it’s in bad faith this won’t work they’ll demand it could be made stricter and use its existence as precident that we should obey them