• hobovision@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Have you read the law? I have and I disagree.

      It’s actually an incredibly privacy conscious method of doing what it is trying to do, which is to allow parents to set up a child’s account with their age information on a device and have that age bracket information passed to websites and applications. That way, it makes it harder for a child to bypass age-restrictions, but without requiring dangerous age verification methods such as ID or face scans.

      It doesn’t require any PII to be sent to any servers and in fact requires that no identity information is sent except age bracket data.

      • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It might not require anything more as currently written, but it’s a foot-in-the-door. Its acceptance and implementation will be taken as precedent that more compufascism can and should be implemented.

          • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            What drugs are you even on? Share me your dealer, c’mon. Why would I want to be mad? I’m just look observing the world around me, it’s not my fault it has gone to shit.