• 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2024

help-circle
  • I honestly don’t like default instance approach. I think people should be able to select tags and they’d get communities recommended with maybe a flag of the country where it comes from next to it and like just a list of blocked communities from that home (inaccesible planets) and like a short description. I don’t think lemmy should become as centralised. I like your idea for that approach. If one community shuts down or like the admins or mods act stupid it would suck for users to not have been given a choice.


  • timestatic@feddit.orgtoLate Stage Capitalism@lemmy.worldVillains
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Its not like they’re hoarding it on their bank account. And ones the stocks of my company fall my 100 mio might not be worth anything or like just a part of it. And still… who would buy the company thats over these assets, and how should the company increase productivity which is in public interest if it does not have a stable ownership situation and it keeps changing due to the cap.

    Just because a company is valued like 3 trillion like nvidia you couldn’t just cash out just like that. Money doesn’t just spawn and the productivity doesn’t just go up. I don’t necessarily want an infinitely sized company but if a company value keeps rising it indicates rising productivity and success which is good for society. A company doesn’t need to make profit to be valued at a certain mark.




  • timestatic@feddit.orgtoLate Stage Capitalism@lemmy.worldVillains
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Depends, the market for a high quality CEO is really competitive and they are at least for most companies still needed for the overall strategie and coherent direction. I understand your point tho in discrepancy between workers and CEO wage. A company usually doesn’t do this just to make their CEO rich, they do it as shareholders because they think it is in their best interest



  • timestatic@feddit.orgtoLate Stage Capitalism@lemmy.worldVillains
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    I liked the build up but the conclusion really made no sense. Yes, capitalism needs to be strictly regulated and sectors that are irreplaceable and are too important to fail can’t be trusted with private companies. I agree with that notion. If you ask for a 100 mio. max wealth tax then you don’t really understand the meaning of wealth. If I start a company and my company gets valued at over 100 mio dollars what should I do? Sell parts of my company? Net worth is not like money on your bank account, and if other people value it so highly and I’m forced to sell parts of it this money won’t really go into public hands. For one someone needs to buy it, with their capped monetary assets, and secondly only because a company is valued at a certain point doesn’t mean you create more productivity or money out of thin air.



  • timestatic@feddit.orgtoLate Stage Capitalism@lemmy.worldVillains
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    For most people if you never had to work a day of your life for you to live a decent life you probably would follow your own interests. And I’m not blaming you for that, but mass wealth isn’t accomplished by everyone going on a journey of selffulfillment. Which economic system works better might I ask you?