• ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Source is RDNA3 not being able to handle FP8 on any OS. It just can’t do FSR4.

      There is an unofficial INT8 version of FSR4 that was leaked from AMD that works on RDNA3, but it’s a lot slower, and FSR4 is already pretty heavy.

      • who@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Would FP8 be exposed as the VK_KHR_shader_float8 vulkan extension?

    • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      https://gpuopen.com/fidelityfx-super-resolution-4/

      uses the hardware-accelerated feature of the AMD RDNA™ 4 architecture

      AMD FidelityFX™ Super Resolution 4 upscaling requires an AMD Radeon RX 9000 Series GPU or better and can only be used on appropriate hardware.

      Requirements

      [FSR 4 Upscaling] AMD Radeon™ RX 9000 Series and above

      It’s possible they add compatibility at a later time (with reduced performance and/or quality due to lack of hardware acceleration), but they haven’t announced anything like that currently

        • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yeah you can hack it in but that’s not official, which results in what you see: performance is not so great. That video only shows a small performance loss because FSR4 is only outputting to 720p, but making FSR4 output to 4k (like a normal TV) is a much bigger demand. But maybe some specific optimizations can be made.