Except that isnt what you said, you said No. Its not strawmaning, I am not defending my point I’m criticising your role in this as useless. My comment and your comment being the two wrongs.
It wasn’t an accusation, it was a hyperbolic comment on the state of copyright law and corporate shenanigans in a deregulated free market late stage capitalism environment.
It wasnt deserving of more because you dont seem to be capable of more, you just followed the downvotes and cant justify why.
It’s your burden to show when things like that happened. You just said a vague sentence while acting like you’re adding to the conversation.
You weren’t.
Two wrongs make a right is a very solid footing for an argument.
Strawmaning is dumb.
I said you should show when something like that happened. Or shut up.
Except that isnt what you said, you said No. Its not strawmaning, I am not defending my point I’m criticising your role in this as useless. My comment and your comment being the two wrongs.
Again: coming to the conversation with a baseless accusation is not helpful, unless supported by any evidence.
It does not deserve anything other than “No.”.
It wasn’t an accusation, it was a hyperbolic comment on the state of copyright law and corporate shenanigans in a deregulated free market late stage capitalism environment.
It wasnt deserving of more because you dont seem to be capable of more, you just followed the downvotes and cant justify why.
It’s like you don’t know how public domain, or the internet, works.
Well the internet is not public domain and information being public does not stop it from being patented.
So its clear you dont have a clue, like was clear from your first comment.