Per the title. If an animal dies out in nature without any human involvement, shouldn’t it be considered vegan to harvest any of the useful parts from it (not nessicarily meat, think hide), since there was no human-caused suffering involved?

Similarly, is driving a car not vegan because of the roadkill issue?

Especially curious to hear a perspective from any practicing moral vegans.

Also: I am not vegan. That’s why I’m asking. I’m not planning on eating roadkill thank you. Just suggesting the existence of animal-based vegan leather.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    why the word “literally” doesn’t mean “literally” anymore and we literally don’t have a replacement word.

    Literally still means literally, it just ironically also means figuratively now too.

    But it’s literally always meant literally.