• davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I wonder how these terms compare to those of the Raspberry Pi Pico series.

  • Ardens@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Here’s the solution. Stop using Arduino. That’s how people power work. Then a new open alternative will pop up, and people can start using that. Ones desire to create and build, should never belong to only one brand - but a universal brand - whenever possible.

    • modus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Hopefully places like Adafruit will stop stocking them. They should also post explanations for people searching directly for them.

    • Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      5 hours ago

      i think it was already dead and replaced by the esp32s - the original arduinos are too expensive for what actually offered: get the performance of a 8-bit cpu with 2k RAM but at raspberry pi prices

      • limdaepl@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Exactly. Why would anyone still use Arduino when alternatives are both better and cheaper?

        • sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 minutes ago

          I still use em cause they work and thats what I learned. my projects are simple enough: ultrasonic sensor detects when someones near, activates a relay etc

  • xiao yun@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Qualcomm has quietly made some massive changes to Arduino’s Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, marking a clear departure from the platform’s founding principles.

    According to Adafruit, the new policies introduce sweeping user-license provisions, broaden data collection (particularly around AI usage), and embed long-term account data retention, all while integrating user information into Qualcomm’s broader data ecosystem.

    Section 7.1 grants Arduino a perpetual, irrevocable license over anything you upload. Your code, projects, forum posts, and comments all fall under this. This remains in effect even after you delete your account. Arduino retains rights to your content indefinitely.

    The license is also royalty-free and sublicensable. Arduino can use your content however they want, distribute it, modify it, and even sublicense it to others.

    The terms further state that users are not allowed to reverse engineer or attempt to understand how the platform works unless Arduino gives permission. Adafruit argues that this contradicts the values that made Arduino attractive to educators, researchers, and hobbyists.

    The Privacy Policy states Arduino is wholly owned by Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. User data, including from minors, flows to other Qualcomm Group companies.

  • abominable_panda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Stupid question.

    Does this apply to what you write and upload on the Arduino IDE to your boards? Or just whatever you publish on their website/ cloud?

      • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s more expensive than what it is really worth years ago, among many other problems. It was a cheap and reliable programming platform when it was Raspberry Pi 1.

          • cenzorrll@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Raspberry pi was founded as a cheap accessible computer that schools with few resources could afford. $25 boards, or if you had big bucks $35. With the intention the price would stay like that with improving technology. They broke this model with the rpi4 and have only gone up in price.

                • Cris@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Really appreciate seeing folks voice this sentiment, thanks for contributing to a positive culture here :)

    • RunningInRVA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Isn’t Arduino more of a software framework and less about the chips themselves? Arduino can run on ESP32 and also on a huge array of ATmega mcus.

      • Archer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I don’t actually know that! I have fiddled with esp32 a bit and was disappointed when Pi’s priced out most of the hobbyist market

  • dustycups@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Beagle boards are looking better - What other alternatives are recommended?
    Edit: sorry, I was thinking of SBC’s. Blue pills & ESP are good hardware, the libraries & toolchain Im not so sure about.