absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 hours agoAre they still underpants if you aren't wearing pants?message-squaremessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up162arrow-down11
arrow-up161arrow-down1message-squareAre they still underpants if you aren't wearing pants?absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 hours agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squarespittingimage@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 hours agoI suggest establishing a formal hierarchy of *-pants, with individual terms to distinguish shape, purpose and colour in conjunction with effective and/or absolute layer. And you should be the one to do it, because I don’t have time for that.
minus-squareabsGeekNZ@lemmy.nzOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-22 hours agoLayer-0 pants are the ones touching your arse. Layer-1 pants cover Layer-0 (tights, stockings, trousers). Layer-2 pants (optional) cover Layer-1 (shorts over tights, trousers, etc…) Simple
minus-squarewatson@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 hours agoWith diagrams explaining, in detail, the purpose and function of each layer. By Monday, or you’re fired.
I suggest establishing a formal hierarchy of *-pants, with individual terms to distinguish shape, purpose and colour in conjunction with effective and/or absolute layer. And you should be the one to do it, because I don’t have time for that.
Layer-0 pants are the ones touching your arse.
Layer-1 pants cover Layer-0 (tights, stockings, trousers).
Layer-2 pants (optional) cover Layer-1 (shorts over tights, trousers, etc…)
Simple
4th dimensional pants (Hyperpants)
With diagrams explaining, in detail, the purpose and function of each layer. By Monday, or you’re fired.