• limonfiesta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This is actually worse than even Paramount aquiring them.

    Both were shit, but this is hands down the worst possible outcome.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      i see them dumping every new show after 1-2 seasons. only keeping the ones that gives the most subscription sign ups.

    • golli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Is it? Paramount+Larry Ellison+the Saudis was not a particular great alternative either. I guess only time will tell, how this turns out.

      With Paramount I think there would have been the risk of WB remaining in a similar form, but being ideologically twisted.

      With Netflix or course there is a larger risk towards theatrical and physical releases as it goes against their primary business model. And the biggest threat to creativity is not ideology, but in a way the opposite. Lack thereof and instead focus on just metrics like short term viewership numbers.

      The best option out of the bad ones would have probably been something like Comcast. Or in my dreams wb would have just stayed independent, splitting of linear assets. They have a ton of debt, but imo eventually they’d have been strong enough to survive. Bur I guess sadly this wasn’t the most lucrative path.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        with NUTREK being so poorly made as it is, paramount/ellison might finally either try to astroturf it or shut down the franchise. isnt physical release where all the pirating is sourced from, or at least most of them.