f3 was fine-ish and f4 complete shit, in my opinion, storywise.
Bethesda fallout and Obsidian fallout live in different universes. Bethesda universe is static with all known elements that return and rerurn and return again sloghtly remixed, Obsidian one returns to f2 theme of post-post-apocalypse where nations fight for resources. Bethesda fallouts are better games, while Obsidian one is a better story.
I would honestly love to see a Fallout with the sort of gameplay in 4 with a story more in the style of New Vegas. The dialogue tree in 4 left a lot to be desired, the plot didn’t leave as much room for player choice as it might have, and there were lore elements that weren’t consistent with previous games, but the combat was great. And honestly, it was much more open-world than 3 in a way that felt more like the other installments. Fallout 3 was a lot of being hedged in by limited options in the ruins of DC and a lot of very samey subway tunnels. The environments of 4 had a lot more variety and let the player roam more.
Tldr: it’s not fallout.
Supposedly.
Good, there already are a lot more fallout then neccessary.
4 was not all that great despite the QoL improvements. We have enough mediocre fallout, but I would give up an ovary for a New Vegas 2.
I’d give up this lady’s ovary for it too
We don’t actually know whose ovaries they’re willing to give up.
It’s my cat’s, and they are actually already sacrificed to the pagan God of unholy union Taliesan.
…Bethesda Fallout. Obsidian Fallout is a different beast entirely.
f3 was fine-ish and f4 complete shit, in my opinion, storywise. Bethesda fallout and Obsidian fallout live in different universes. Bethesda universe is static with all known elements that return and rerurn and return again sloghtly remixed, Obsidian one returns to f2 theme of post-post-apocalypse where nations fight for resources. Bethesda fallouts are better games, while Obsidian one is a better story.
I would honestly love to see a Fallout with the sort of gameplay in 4 with a story more in the style of New Vegas. The dialogue tree in 4 left a lot to be desired, the plot didn’t leave as much room for player choice as it might have, and there were lore elements that weren’t consistent with previous games, but the combat was great. And honestly, it was much more open-world than 3 in a way that felt more like the other installments. Fallout 3 was a lot of being hedged in by limited options in the ruins of DC and a lot of very samey subway tunnels. The environments of 4 had a lot more variety and let the player roam more.
In a world where smartphones were invented in the 1920s…
“Flame wars… flame wars never changes…”