King@sh.itjust.works to movies@piefed.socialEnglish · edit-28 days agoParamount Makes Hostile Bid for Warner Bros. at $30 a Share, despite Netflix dealir.paramount.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up148arrow-down10 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up148arrow-down1external-linkParamount Makes Hostile Bid for Warner Bros. at $30 a Share, despite Netflix dealir.paramount.comKing@sh.itjust.works to movies@piefed.socialEnglish · edit-28 days agomessage-square12fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareFoni@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEspañolarrow-up9·8 days agoDo all the options really involve greater market concentration? Are there no outside companies interested in diversifying?
minus-squarebrucethemoose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-28 days agoNo one really wants (to simplify) aging cable channels, HBO, and Harry Potter unless they can leverage them somehow. Netflix can fold them into their streaming and presumably cut a lot of redundancy. Comcast already owns the Harry Potter parks and cable channels. They very much need the prestige of the HBO brand. Paramount is freshly flush with cash and presumably just trying to just grab market share to stand a fighting chance. But… outside companies can’t really use it as well. What would (for example) Sony do with all that?
Do all the options really involve greater market concentration? Are there no outside companies interested in diversifying?
No one really wants (to simplify) aging cable channels, HBO, and Harry Potter unless they can leverage them somehow.
Netflix can fold them into their streaming and presumably cut a lot of redundancy.
Comcast already owns the Harry Potter parks and cable channels. They very much need the prestige of the HBO brand.
Paramount is freshly flush with cash and presumably just trying to just grab market share to stand a fighting chance.
But… outside companies can’t really use it as well. What would (for example) Sony do with all that?
deleted by creator