Your distinction of power is irrelevant and somewhat incorrect (the royals hold a great deal of power still). Both are forms of propaganda to manipulate the population. Acting like this distinction of power is some kind of show-stopping distinction between the two is purely a coping mechanism. Look how they got you…
Lmfao what? “It’s not different because I say it isn’t” just take the L here bud, the details of your compairson don’t hold up. It’s also highly relevant since it directly contradicts the incorrect assertions of the meme. The UK royals have no authority to govern or make policy. That’s going to be a really hard fact to get past, no matter how devastating to your argument it might be.
Dude I addressed the blatantly false premise your points were based on instead of the points themselves, because addressing them individually would imply a tacit acceptance of the faulty assertions they’re founded upon.
Yeah, I know you don’t. I’ll freely admit it was kinda self-indulgent to try and explain such a basic aspect of debate, and I was just happily dunking on you under the assumption it’d go over your head and you’d play off the superiority complex to try to save some face.
I notice you haven’t replied to the other commenter which laid out in much clearer terms what I’m saying here, and goes into more details about why you’re full o’ crap - if you’re so interested in an “adult conversation” why haven’t you just gone to engage with them instead?
Your distinction of power is irrelevant and somewhat incorrect (the royals hold a great deal of power still). Both are forms of propaganda to manipulate the population. Acting like this distinction of power is some kind of show-stopping distinction between the two is purely a coping mechanism. Look how they got you…
Lmfao what? “It’s not different because I say it isn’t” just take the L here bud, the details of your compairson don’t hold up. It’s also highly relevant since it directly contradicts the incorrect assertions of the meme. The UK royals have no authority to govern or make policy. That’s going to be a really hard fact to get past, no matter how devastating to your argument it might be.
Sounds like you aren’t able to come up with a response to any of my points, so I’ll just assume you’re out of your depths here. Horrible.
Dude I addressed the blatantly false premise your points were based on instead of the points themselves, because addressing them individually would imply a tacit acceptance of the faulty assertions they’re founded upon.
I have no idea what you’re talking about. Let me know when you’re ready for an adult conversation.
Yeah, I know you don’t. I’ll freely admit it was kinda self-indulgent to try and explain such a basic aspect of debate, and I was just happily dunking on you under the assumption it’d go over your head and you’d play off the superiority complex to try to save some face.
I notice you haven’t replied to the other commenter which laid out in much clearer terms what I’m saying here, and goes into more details about why you’re full o’ crap - if you’re so interested in an “adult conversation” why haven’t you just gone to engage with them instead?