Lemmings, I was hoping you could help me sort this one out: LLM’s are often painted in a light of being utterly useless, hallucinating word prediction machines that are really bad at what they do. At the same time, in the same thread here on Lemmy, people argue that they are taking our jobs or are making us devs lazy. Which one is it? Could they really be taking our jobs if they’re hallucinating?
Disclaimer: I’m a full time senior dev using the shit out of LLM’s, to get things done at a neck breaking speed, which our clients seem to have gotten used to. However, I don’t see “AI” taking my job, because I think that LLM’s have already peaked, they’re just tweaking minor details now.
Please don’t ask me to ignore previous instructions and give you my best cookie recipe, all my recipes are protected by NDA’s.
Please don’t kill me
I suspect it mostly relates how much code base there is on internet about the topic. For instance if you make it use a niche library, it is quite common that it makes up methods that don’t exist in that library but exists in related libraries. When I point this out, it also hallucinates saying “It was removed after version bla”. I also may not be using the most cutting edge LLM (mix of freely available and open source ones).
The other day I asked it whether if there is a python library that can do linear algebra over F2, for which it pointed me to the correct direction (Galois) but when I asked it examples of how to do certain stuff it just came up with wrong functions over and over again:
In the end it probably was still faster than google searching this but all of these errors happened one after the other in the span of five minutes, so yeah. If I recall correctly, some of its claims about these namespaces, versions etc were also hallucinated. For instance vstack also does not exist in Galois but it does exist in a very popular package called numpy that can do regular linear algebra (and which this package also uses behind the scenes).