• menas@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Actually, according to Adam Smith, the meet of offer and demands has an equilibrium, **if and only if ** :

    • everyone could join and leave the market
    • the information is pure and perfect
    • the joining of leaving of anyone on the market would not affect the market
    • and a fourth one I have forgotten (it was 15 years ago t.t)

    Leaving without contraint mean that I would not affect you life to stop participate in this market. It may mean that things needed are not on the market, or if their are, that it would be provided by another mean outside the market.

    It also mean that advertisement should be ban, or that the information of what exists on the market is very accurate. I was looking for the political system the most compatible with this theory, and I found councilism. And then, I discovered the whole name is fucking Council communism. I was radicalized from libtard to commies by Adam Smith, this how this society is absurd.

    The question is why politics, rich people and bosses never appli the most basics principles of the theory they are supposed to use: Historical materialism and stuff

    • saimen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Isn’t one thing also that the market participants have to act rationally and in their own self interest (without mass manipulation or even delusion).