I personally feel that goes against what this community should be about but I’d like feedback, especially on wording.

I don’t feel generative “ai” audio is fitting here but a eurorack/modular/generative sequencer type thing would be welcome.

Given a recent post I believe the general community agrees but I need help with wording.

Any thoughts are appreciated.

Edit: not the focus, but I do think stem splitting models are fine, but I would interested in discussion about that too.

  • trashcan@sh.itjust.worksOPM
    1·
    15 days ago

    See, this is something I wasn’t aware of that further complicates this. I think I see things similarly but that makes it nkneasiwe to define a rule.

      • trashcan@sh.itjust.worksOPM
        3·
        14 days ago

        lmao, sorry, I’m not even sure if I can parse that.

        Essentially I really appreciate the input and nuance your comment provided. But despite that I have further difficulty in refining a comprehensive and specific “rule” for the community.

        I could just enforce it based on “vibes” but it’s my understanding that people don’t like that approach to moderation. It may work now but ideally this place will grow and it could easily end up in prompt created audio spam territory.