I personally feel that goes against what this community should be about but I’d like feedback, especially on wording.

I don’t feel generative “ai” audio is fitting here but a eurorack/modular/generative sequencer type thing would be welcome.

Given a recent post I believe the general community agrees but I need help with wording.

Any thoughts are appreciated.

Edit: not the focus, but I do think stem splitting models are fine, but I would interested in discussion about that too.

  • gid@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Personally, I think “no gen ai music” would be well-enough understood as a rule to exclude AI generated songs but not music where AI has been used as a novel tool as part of the production process.

    Alternatively, you could hold off on adding a rule like that and leave upvotes/downvotes as the method for evaluating posts with gen ai music. If this community starts to get inundated with low quality posts you could then revisit enforcing a rule?

    • trashcan@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      Alternatively, you could hold off on adding a rule like that and leave upvotes/downvotes as the method for evaluating posts with gen ai music. If this community starts to get inundated with low quality posts you could then revisit enforcing a rule?

      This could work for now. But with little traffic (admittedly partly my fault) it could still easily become a list mostly made up of downvoted slop.