I’m considering the switch to GrapheneOS, so I watched this interview with one of the members of the GrapheneOS team, and honestly, I feel it was a great general introduction to it and touched on common features and misconceptions.

For those who don’t know, it’s one of the most secure and private mobile operating systems out there. Some things that I took away:

  1. They touched upon MAC randomization. I researched a bit on my own about what the need for it is. Apparently, it’s standard practice to randomize MAC addresses when scanning WiFi connections. However, GrapheneOS (and Pixel firmware) are even better at this, as they make sure they don’t leak any other identifiers when doing so. They also allow you to get a new random MAC for every connection that you make (not sure whether this is very useful, as this can cause problems). On a related note, even when WiFi/Bluetooth are “off,” stock Android can still scan in the background to improve location accuracy (by matching visible networks/devices against Google’s database). So basically, even with WiFi/Bluetooth off, Google still knows where you are. In GrapheneOS, this option is off by default.

  2. They have their own reverse proxies that they use to talk to Google on your behalf when needed.

  3. Apparently, in the USA you can be compelled to provide a fingerprint or Face ID. Courts have ruled this doesn’t violate the 5th Amendment because it’s physical, not testimonial. BUT you cannot be compelled to provide a password/PIN. That’s considered testimonial evidence, protected by the 5th Amendment. GrapheneOS has a two-factor system where, after using your fingerprint, you still need to enter a PIN, so it helps with this. They also have a BFU state after reboot, which is the safest and requires you to enter your full passphrase.

  • Mugita Sokio@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    As far as I’m aware, they don’t have Fairphone support for reasons they already explain. Despite the baggage of the Pixel hardware, it’s the best hardware security wise, which is why the devs chose it (McCay firstly before someone else took over while that troll continued to be on the board).

    • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah, Fairphone doesn’t have a huge focus on security architecture, so a lot of GrapheneOS security features would not just be severely crippled, but would simply not be available at all.