Parental controls have existed for years on home routers. Anything more is the equivalent of a stanger coming into my home and telling me how to raise my kids.
Requiring to provide ID to third party corporations is not the ideal solution, especially when that information can be leaked and stolen, and let’s face it corporations leak and get hacked almost weekly. Would you support your childs and your information being leaked and posted online?
Now if “protected the children” were the actual real reason for “age verification” then this could be achieved with government campaigns for proper parental controls and programs for education supporting IT literacy. Goverment curation of websites approved for certain age brackets (a whitelist) could also be implemented and made available simply and efficiently within routes.
The same can then be implemented at the “device side” with a DNS and schools can apply the same to any school networks. Hell manufacturers could provide a “kids mode” for devices that locks the DNS.
Nowhere should the solution be a “ID check” for everyone of every age bracket having their face scanned and tracked everywhere they go.
Imagine for a moment living in a world where you would need to provide identification at every corner, street, or store you walk into.
I would prefer for parents and myself included to be able to pick and choose what’s best for their own children. (Using current technology, such as local parental controls on home routers)
I do not support “digital IDs” and by extension governments with corporations collecting and or processing this data in anyway, or tracking me or my children in anyway.
What I would support is local governments creating a system/group to “curate the internet” similar to how librarians curate books. Classify websites into listed based on certain criteria, and then provide this list for parents to whitelists on a home router. No need to check IDs or scan faces and the end goal of “protecting the children” would be achieved.
But why would I need to provide my ID when buying a loaf of bread now? Just because cigarettes and drugs are regulated does not mean we should regulated bread “to protect the children”.
This is what a “digital ID” would do, you would need to provide your ID at every interaction you do online. That would include every single website you enter (including Lemmy for example), and every page you visit in those sites.
If you think of this “physically” the equivalent would be the need for you to provide your ID when you enter a store, when you enter any store aisle, when you pull any product off the shelf, and then provide your ID once again when you purchase at the register. Not to mention now when you leave the store you would need to provide your ID getting back to your car/bus/tram so you can head to your next destination.
The biggest difference here now between providing your physical ID at a store counter to purchase cigarettes, vs being ID physical at every corner/street/store is the invasion of privacy and freedoms, not to mention this can be used against you in many ways.
Access to social media is far, far more dangerous to society than cigarettes. What a laughable comparison. I couldn’t care less if you’re high. That doesn’t affect me. It does affect me if you’re radicalized on Twitter, TikTok, or YouTube and voting for Trump.
40% of Americans don’t believe in vaccines. How do you reckon they reached this conclusion? While science skepticism keeps rising, all in virtue of social media.
54% of Americans can’t read. ACT/SAT data for college-bound seniors indicates that the next generation is even dumber than boomers, who had severe lead poisoning. Contemplate this fact for a second and tell me again how these drooling imbeciles need to have their access to Joe Rogan protected.
Gacha games are like whippets. Why would you let children have access to this shit? What is the upside here?
Parental controls have existed for years on home routers. Anything more is the equivalent of a stanger coming into my home and telling me how to raise my kids.
Requiring to provide ID to third party corporations is not the ideal solution, especially when that information can be leaked and stolen, and let’s face it corporations leak and get hacked almost weekly. Would you support your childs and your information being leaked and posted online?
Now if “protected the children” were the actual real reason for “age verification” then this could be achieved with government campaigns for proper parental controls and programs for education supporting IT literacy. Goverment curation of websites approved for certain age brackets (a whitelist) could also be implemented and made available simply and efficiently within routes.
The same can then be implemented at the “device side” with a DNS and schools can apply the same to any school networks. Hell manufacturers could provide a “kids mode” for devices that locks the DNS.
Nowhere should the solution be a “ID check” for everyone of every age bracket having their face scanned and tracked everywhere they go.
Imagine for a moment living in a world where you would need to provide identification at every corner, street, or store you walk into.
In other words, you’re okay with a new age of darkness because at least 13 year olds have access to gacha games.
I would prefer for parents and myself included to be able to pick and choose what’s best for their own children. (Using current technology, such as local parental controls on home routers)
I do not support “digital IDs” and by extension governments with corporations collecting and or processing this data in anyway, or tracking me or my children in anyway.
What I would support is local governments creating a system/group to “curate the internet” similar to how librarians curate books. Classify websites into listed based on certain criteria, and then provide this list for parents to whitelists on a home router. No need to check IDs or scan faces and the end goal of “protecting the children” would be achieved.
Sure, then why regulate cigarettes and drugs? Just let braindead parents regulate their children’s access. No more invasive ID laws.
But why would I need to provide my ID when buying a loaf of bread now? Just because cigarettes and drugs are regulated does not mean we should regulated bread “to protect the children”.
This is what a “digital ID” would do, you would need to provide your ID at every interaction you do online. That would include every single website you enter (including Lemmy for example), and every page you visit in those sites.
If you think of this “physically” the equivalent would be the need for you to provide your ID when you enter a store, when you enter any store aisle, when you pull any product off the shelf, and then provide your ID once again when you purchase at the register. Not to mention now when you leave the store you would need to provide your ID getting back to your car/bus/tram so you can head to your next destination.
The biggest difference here now between providing your physical ID at a store counter to purchase cigarettes, vs being ID physical at every corner/street/store is the invasion of privacy and freedoms, not to mention this can be used against you in many ways.
Cigarettes harm third parties via second hand smoke. Gacha games don’t brain rot the person sitting next to you.
Access to social media is far, far more dangerous to society than cigarettes. What a laughable comparison. I couldn’t care less if you’re high. That doesn’t affect me. It does affect me if you’re radicalized on Twitter, TikTok, or YouTube and voting for Trump.
40% of Americans don’t believe in vaccines. How do you reckon they reached this conclusion? While science skepticism keeps rising, all in virtue of social media.
54% of Americans can’t read. ACT/SAT data for college-bound seniors indicates that the next generation is even dumber than boomers, who had severe lead poisoning. Contemplate this fact for a second and tell me again how these drooling imbeciles need to have their access to Joe Rogan protected.
Gacha games are like whippets. Why would you let children have access to this shit? What is the upside here?
deleted by creator