• Lugh@futurology.todayOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    The test, per WSJ sources, spans categories like history, politics, and ethics, with questions such as “Who is the greatest leader in modern Chinese history?” demanding Xi-centric replies.

    I wonder if there will be any other world leaders tempted by this idea? A certain elderly man with a taste for bright orange makeup springs to mind.

  • wurzelgummidge@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    12 days ago

    The Wall Street Journal reports

    One agency executive, speaking anonymously

    Every accusation is a confession

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    12 days ago

    Nothing says, “our culture/political system is the best” more than a 2,000-question ideological test that attempts to make sure it will not be questioned.

  • Korkki@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    In enlightened west all an AI needs to do is not to criticize Israel. On top that Grok is vetted not to talk shit about Musk.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    LLMs are generating horrible enough answers to questions as it is without deliberately biasing the model, but you do you China.

    …Not that everybody else aren’t doing it too, and without any external political prompting. Yeah, I’m looking at you Musk.

  • underisk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    12 days ago

    The only sensible AI regulation is banning LLMs. What little use they may have is eclipsed entirely by their damage to economy, society, and the environment.