I tried watching what was supposed to be a video comparing several linux distros. Instead, it was AI text to speech narrating over random images. Are people uploading this crap in an attempt to get a share of ad revenue, or just to be awful? I have to hope Youtube doesn’t let this be fully automated, so people are doing this on purpose…
Just watched a “Feynman” video on Youtube I thought was a little off. Especially when one of the examples simply seemed outright wrong.
But I thought it was probably me who misunderstood something. Until I read the description, and it turned out his voice was recreated by AI, and the “lecture” was designed by an unknown person to be in the “spirit” of Feynman!It had Feynman’s name all over it, and then in the description they end it with:
No impersonation is intended
When they had his name all over it, and the title claims it’s a lecture by Feynman which it absolutely wasn’t, and they use AI to simulate his voice!! How is that not impersonating? That shit should be outright illegal, it is fraud, Feynman had nothing to do with the content, and it even had mistakes!
Unfortunately on Youtube I can’t find a way to block a channel after having seen the video. That option seems to only be available on my start page for the suggested videos on that page.
I have blocked hundreds of AI crap channels, and they keep popping up.Just stop watching Youtube entirely except for channels you specifically want. The entire thing is a slop platform.
This happened to me with Alan Watts, but I’ve heard so much of his content that I knew it was fake within a couple of minutes. It’s such a problem that legitimate fans of his are now mostly posting with titles that include ‘real’ ‘authentic’ or ‘no ai’ in order to stand out from the mountains of BS.
Don’t see the slop because I only use subscriptions feed.
Slop videos have clogged the recommendations on youtube since well before the AI era. Top 10 clickbait videos with text to speech narration…
To expand on this, I have witnessed small, indie channels have their content copied, processed through AI so it is stripped of audio, watermarks and re-edited. Then it is posted as a new video. When it is reported as a fake, or pirated copy, or not original content, Google then puts the burden of proof on the small indie channel that originally created the content, often requiring them to lawyer up and file a legal complaint, before they will take any action to remove the AI slop. It is fucking absurd. It would only take a real person about 60 seconds to compare the content and dates to determine who is the theif.
The other 70% are non-AI brainrot videos. 1% has any value.
This. AI just boosted it, it was always like that
You see a lot of ai videos of prominent personalities, seriously doubt they have permission to use their identity.
Are brainrot videos the ones where someone on an impossibly clean set hides the 5 seconds of info you were promised somewhere in a 20 minute video the purports to explain the process you need and it end up no longer matching the software’s UI?
Asking for a friend ;-)
And yet I don’t see any of that. Lots of people complain about “the algorithm” but it seems to be working well for me.
My algorithm is as simple as avoiding YouTube altogether and finding what I need elsewhere (preferably in text form).
The worst thing I’ve found with the algorithm is that it continually tries to steer me towards right-wing crap like Jordan Petersen and various manosphere posers, even though I watch a lot of LGBTQ+ and Marxist channels. And if ever you come to YouTube with no account on a clean machine on a new IP address, it pushes almost entirely right-wing propaganda videos.
