• Bubs@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Nerd talk: (putting aside the ethics of the article), would that be a good or bad screw design compared to screws we currently have available?

    Manufacturing the screwdriver/bit would be super easy, one pass with a flat bottom cutter to remove each quarter from the end.

    The two remaining quarters of the bit being separated could maybe be more of a problem than if they were joined together.

    You would get the same contact area as a flathead screw, but with only half the material behind it. But the bit would set so much better than a flathead and would not slide around.

    I’m curious how something like this would compare to a hex or star screw. I would imagine a little bit worse, but the potentially easier manufacturing might make up for it.

    • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The surface that takes the pressure would be very similar to a flat screwdriver. Looks like it has no taper, so it would be harder to put in place but harder for it to skip when applying torque. It’s not a good design, but not horrible.

      • yuri@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 hours ago

        only benefits of flathead screws are:

        1. ezpz to make if you have to make a custom screw

        2. when you strip a (better headed) screw, you can just cut a single channel and you’re ready to try again

        3. i guess maybe they’re cheaper? idk i really think it’s just the two things