You’re exaggerating. Many things people come up with for movies are based on or similar to some things from older shows. You don’t have to make every single creature 100% unique and original. It would actually be strange if people wouldn’t be able to recognize anything on the screen. Look at Guardians of the Galaxy; you have a human, a green humanoid, a red humanoid, a tree-like humanoid and badger like humanoid. Not really levels of creativity beyond AI… Not to mention that the most popular movies today are all remakes and sequels.
The example from Disney was lazy and stupid, AI sux in general but “not being able to create anything new” is not really the main problem here.
And I’m saying that in the context of creativity and using AI for movies it’s not that important. The short movie from the articles is not bad because AI can’t do any better. It’s bad because whoever used the AI tool did a bad job.
You’re exaggerating. Many things people come up with for movies are based on or similar to some things from older shows. You don’t have to make every single creature 100% unique and original. It would actually be strange if people wouldn’t be able to recognize anything on the screen. Look at Guardians of the Galaxy; you have a human, a green humanoid, a red humanoid, a tree-like humanoid and badger like humanoid. Not really levels of creativity beyond AI… Not to mention that the most popular movies today are all remakes and sequels.
The example from Disney was lazy and stupid, AI sux in general but “not being able to create anything new” is not really the main problem here.
You’re misunderstanding. Op is not saying humans don’t interpolate. They are saying AI can’t extrapolate.
And I’m saying that in the context of creativity and using AI for movies it’s not that important. The short movie from the articles is not bad because AI can’t do any better. It’s bad because whoever used the AI tool did a bad job.
I think your point is valid, but unrelated to previous responses.