Not exactly. As long as the description is understood by AI, it can be generated and won’t be a mish-mash of other animals.
This just showcases the need for precise, and well understood prompt engineering - aka why you can’t just get rid of your designers and have overpaid managers prompt the AI because those chuckfuckles know fuck-all about the process, or creativity (same reason why software engineers won’t be replaced by managers either).
Now obviously, the term to describe what you want has to exist in common vernacular, and for visual AIs, has to have been referenced in the dataset, in some form or manner, for the AI to be able to output it. And ideally, actual designers, graphic artists in the props and costumes department would be using AI for quick visual prototyping, to confirm details, etc., within minutes of the discussion happening (instead of spending hours or days for initial sketches to be declined, refined, finalised), speeding up the process before the final version is then hand-made. This would be the ideal workflow, but some companies have simply grown too big for their own good - like Disney, the leadership is so detached from the actual workforce delivering their products that meddling middle-managers who only care about immediate quarterly and annual costs and incomes, can easily convince said leaders to “help” by getting rid of the expensive people, “replace” them with AI and save tons of money while “delivering the same quality”. Except they’re now realising that it’s nowhere near the same quality, and their customers will actively reject the companies for doing this - but the middle managers don’t care, they delivered “growth” by saving a fuckton of money by firing people thus not having to pay their salaries, got their big fat bonuses for these actions and have already fucked off to the next company to ruin…
Not exactly. As long as the description is understood by AI, it can be generated and won’t be a mish-mash of other animals.
This just showcases the need for precise, and well understood prompt engineering - aka why you can’t just get rid of your designers and have overpaid managers prompt the AI because those chuckfuckles know fuck-all about the process, or creativity (same reason why software engineers won’t be replaced by managers either).
Now obviously, the term to describe what you want has to exist in common vernacular, and for visual AIs, has to have been referenced in the dataset, in some form or manner, for the AI to be able to output it. And ideally, actual designers, graphic artists in the props and costumes department would be using AI for quick visual prototyping, to confirm details, etc., within minutes of the discussion happening (instead of spending hours or days for initial sketches to be declined, refined, finalised), speeding up the process before the final version is then hand-made. This would be the ideal workflow, but some companies have simply grown too big for their own good - like Disney, the leadership is so detached from the actual workforce delivering their products that meddling middle-managers who only care about immediate quarterly and annual costs and incomes, can easily convince said leaders to “help” by getting rid of the expensive people, “replace” them with AI and save tons of money while “delivering the same quality”. Except they’re now realising that it’s nowhere near the same quality, and their customers will actively reject the companies for doing this - but the middle managers don’t care, they delivered “growth” by saving a fuckton of money by firing people thus not having to pay their salaries, got their big fat bonuses for these actions and have already fucked off to the next company to ruin…