TheImpressiveX@piefed.socialM to movies@piefed.socialEnglish · 4 days agoMegalopolis: the $120m Coppola flop that just won't go away — A screening tour, a New Year's re-release, a documentary, an incoming director's cut … will we ever be rid of this historic misfire?www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up165arrow-down14
arrow-up161arrow-down1external-linkMegalopolis: the $120m Coppola flop that just won't go away — A screening tour, a New Year's re-release, a documentary, an incoming director's cut … will we ever be rid of this historic misfire?www.theguardian.comTheImpressiveX@piefed.socialM to movies@piefed.socialEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squarehydrashok@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up11·4 days agoThe way I think of it, the “directors cut” is the version the director wanted without outside influences. The theatrical release was cut by a group with the director, editor, producers, and studio all having a say in the final result.
minus-squareFoni@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up17·4 days agoNormally yes, I agree with what you say, but in this case the director, producer, editor and editor were the same person or were 100% supervised
The way I think of it, the “directors cut” is the version the director wanted without outside influences. The theatrical release was cut by a group with the director, editor, producers, and studio all having a say in the final result.
Normally yes, I agree with what you say, but in this case the director, producer, editor and editor were the same person or were 100% supervised