Notice how the contributions these Anarchists made don’t end up in -isms. Anarchist theory is important, because you’re building this malleable theory that can adapt and change depending on the material conditions of regions and eras. When you look at the progression of Marxism to Marxism-Leninism to Marxism-Leninism-Maoism it’s basically just “Yea, what the last guy said, but now me!”
Notice how the contributions these Anarchists made don’t end up in -isms. Anarchist theory is important, because you’re building this malleable theory that can adapt and change depending on the material conditions of regions and eras. When you look at the progression of Marxism to Marxism-Leninism to Marxism-Leninism-Maoism it’s basically just “Yea, what the last guy said, but now me!”
Ooh that is a very good observation and analysis, thanks for bringing that to my attention.