The headlines structure, the wording, the “conclusion,” the feeling that it’s just providing information in a long winded and exceedingly neutral way rather than asserting an opinion (like a blog) or reporting facts journalistically makes it feel like the author put facts into an LLM, asked it to produce this, but made the graph themselves.
It’s not awful. But at the same time (AI or not) reading it feels kind of fillery, like bland junk food.
Squints.
…This feels like AI.
The headlines structure, the wording, the “conclusion,” the feeling that it’s just providing information in a long winded and exceedingly neutral way rather than asserting an opinion (like a blog) or reporting facts journalistically makes it feel like the author put facts into an LLM, asked it to produce this, but made the graph themselves.
It’s not awful. But at the same time (AI or not) reading it feels kind of fillery, like bland junk food.