Doug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoThe party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1399arrow-down12
arrow-up1397arrow-down1imageThe party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.lemmy.worldDoug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareruuster13@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·21 hours agoHe trotted then. Whatever. There was excitement in the approach.
minus-squareiamthetot@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·12 hours agoIt was an aggressive approach, but it’s not “whatever”. Words matter. You lose credibility when you accuse the other side of lying for a political point, then you lie for a political point.
He trotted then. Whatever. There was excitement in the approach.
It was an aggressive approach, but it’s not “whatever”. Words matter. You lose credibility when you accuse the other side of lying for a political point, then you lie for a political point.