• aliser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    10 hours ago

    FYI: as a user, you are already allowed to uninstall Windows and switch to Linux

    • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      IT admin here, we certainly do know how to do it, and already have. It’s an appx package, and it’s really not difficult to remove.

  • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Oh they’ll “allow” it, how’s this go fuck yourself and keep your shitty AI crap to yourself since you fucking love it so much.

    • Rooster326@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      You can request to disable it.

      FTFY

      There is always the possibility it is always there. Watching. Waiting… For an update

      You can’t trust big windows

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      You are not spending tens of millions annually and thus Microsoft doesn’t give a shit about you. They literally would not piss on you if you were on fire.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I mean, they already lost the war to Linux on infrastructure, those are billions they never made. It’s not unlikely for them to lose the desktop as well.

        • kchr@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Not really. Almost every Windows-based organization over a certain number of employees will use some shape or form of Active Directory (whether on-prem or in Azure) and most likely also Office 365, which is corporate/enterprise infrastrucure that is really hard to migrate away from once you built your IT and processes around it.

          All the license fees for just retaining access to and being able to onboard new employees in that infrastructure is a huge portion of the budget for these organizations.

          They just gave up the war on competing with UNIX/Linux on the non-enterprise production infrastructure side, since there were no money to be made there.

            • kchr@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I know what you mean, but it’s not what you said. :-)

              Just wanted to point out that they still have monopoly on the enterprise side of organization infrastructure, which is huge - the number of companies running production systems on self-hosted Linux infrastructure are orders of magnitude fewer than those that don’t, even if the number of Windows servers in total might be fewer.

              Microsoft gets paid per employee, per application suite and per cloud service (if Azure is involved for the AD) - not only per server. They were very early on the recurring subscription model almost every SaaS provider is leaning into nowadays, even for on-prem stuff.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        That’s not really the point though. I’m not even talking about end users. Government agencies, corporate backend services, customer service agencies and more are all abandoning Windows for Linux partially because Win11 is a horrible product, but also because the requirements just keep growing which is stupid.

        Microsoft’s response to this is the above, which they were STAUNCHLY opposed to previously because they need to try and force AI down users throats to justify the money they have pissed away on it. They’re shoehorning Copilot bullshit into every product line they have now, and it’s WILDLY unpopular and unnecessary. If this is the best they can do to address it, they’ll continue to hemorrhage users.

        When more state agencies in the US start switching, they’ll release some “Windows Lite” bullshit, but it will too late because the commitments needed for these organizations to bother switching is massive. They’ll be losing licenses for an entire generation of Windows at the very least.

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    May allow

    The benevolence! Your own computer can do whatever you want it to… if MS agrees to it.

    • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Our luck was that personal computers existed before phones. The fact computing is open is a miracle.

      Microsoft would love to only sell computers with locked bootloaders, enforced DRM, locked down stores. Imagine having to jailbreak your desktop.

      • wuffah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        People call me paranoid, but after my dad’s MS Surface spontaneously encrypted itself and lost the recovery keys, my belief is that what you described is the goal they are working towards.

        Apple already does all of this along with client side scanning and MS is falling over itself to implement the same ecosystem.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Hardware alone is not a working computer. If you control the software running on your computer then that software is yours (like it’s your book on your bookshelf even though another owns the copyright to it). If someone else controls yours computer then that erodes your ownership of the computer.

  • statelesz@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    20 hours ago

    You know what Microsoft doesn’t have to allow you? Install Linux on your own device!

  • Auster@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Reading the article, it’s so many conditions to be uninstallable I fear even Bill Gates himself couldn’t.