• samc@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 hours ago

    To be honest, I’m starting to drink the Sourcehut coolaid here. We have a distributed method of interacting with repositories: Email.

    Don’t get me wrong, the current user experience of email-based patches and discussion isn’t great because it’s too easy to send a badly formatted patch. But if we invested time in making email patches easier to use (e.g. sending them through a web ui for people who prefer github style PRs) then we could skip all the architectural pains of solutions like forgefed.

    • RushLana@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I don’t know if email is a good solution. Having contributed to the linux kernel ( in 2010ish ) may have distorted my perception of the gitmail workflow but it doesn’t seems very accesible and i can’t possibly see a change allowing this to be usable by semi-technical users.

      • samc@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The change would be using Gitmail as the plumbing, and normalising the creation of user-friendly porcelain on top.

        E.g. suppose there is a repo foo/bar hosted by a forgejo instance at myinstance.org/foo/bar. Sending an email to [email protected] (or similar) could automatically create a PR and, conversely, opening a PR could send a patch series to the foo/bar mailing list.