• folaht@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Welcome to Lemmy, where ‘socialist countries’ means nations that follow Marxist-Leninism and not a form of modern utopian socialism better known as social democracy that took bits and pieces of Marxist-Leninism under a capitalist umbrella.

    So not like Denmark, but like China or Vietnam.

    • Griffus@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      That’s an extreme USian way of viewing it. Not saying you’re wrong, 'cause I’ve observed the same. But @[email protected] worded reality really well in a comment just above.

      • folaht@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The USian way of viewing socialism is “centre-right liberalism + religious democratics + social liberalism + social democracy + democratic socialism + marxist leninism” = socialism

          • folaht@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            No, they do not.

            They are two economic systems predicted by Karl Marx to be superseding capitalism,
            with communism superseding socialism.

            Socialism is what China currently is.

            Communism is thought to be like star trek.
            No one needs to use currency for their survival.
            There’s no large gap between the rich and the poor.
            Government plays a small to non-existent role.