• thenoirwolfess@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Ring is owned by Amazon, so it makes sense. You can’t really trust any company fully, but Anker and Reolink are OK for now

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Reolink

      Any cameras that can operate entirely offline are good. Dahua and Hikvision are good too. Look for cameras with RTSP and ONVIF support. ONVIF is a standardized API for interacting with cameras and can handle things like pan/tilt/zoom, sending events from the camera to the NVR (eg motion detection), and a bunch of other things.

      I use Blue Iris as my NVR, which is usually regarded as the best, but there’s other good software too (like Frigate), and hardware solutions too.

      Just follow best practices - keep them isolated on a separate VLAN with no internet access. If you want remote access to your NVR, use a VPN like Tailscale.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Though, on the other hand, having the video saved offsite is useful because then anyone with physical access to your home can’t get rid of the video showing they’re there.

        This is not an argument in favour of using cloud services, because that gives access to your video to anyone the company deems should have access (or sometimes individual workers who either have access as part of their job or gain access because businesses suck at security). It’s in response to you saying isolate the cameras from the internet entirely; there is a good reason to have them connected (though you could have a PC handle that with a connection to two networks and no physical or software bridge between the two, just take video from one, upload (encrypted) to server on other).

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Though, on the other hand, having the video saved offsite is useful because then anyone with physical access to your home can’t get rid of the video showing they’re there.

          I have Blue Iris configured to send all alert videos to one of my storage VPSes via SFTP. As soon as someone is detected outside, the video clip is sent offsite.

          The server and the PoE switch that powers the cameras are also on a UPS, which helps if the intruder tries to shut off the power at the main breaker (which, here in California, always needs to be located outside).

          It’s in response to you saying isolate the cameras from the internet entirely

          The cameras themselves should always be isolated. No internet access for the cameras at all. Your NVR can have network access, and is what would handle uploading the videos to internet storage somewhere.

      • notthebees@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Hikvision is app only which is really annoying. I wouldn’t recommend it. (it also crashes my emulator for some reason)

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Anker owns Eufy right? The company that had all their cameras recording to a publicly accessible cloud storage?

      Yeah not trusting them either.

      • Mailloche@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        My eufys are supposed to be local only. Shit I hope so… That’s why I bought them in the first place