• mech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        So if he hadn’t made Avatar, they would have been better off?

        • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          No, if he hadn’t been allowed to take billions of dollars in profits off the movies and intead the rewards had been more equitably distributed, they would have been better off.

          I don’t get what’s so difficult about this concept. One guy doesn’t do much work, gets most of the money. Bunch of people do most of the work, get very little money. Way too many people with no money, “this is the best possible system and I will defend it with my dying breath.”

          • mech@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            You’re describing a valid criticism of Capitalism, which I share 100%.
            I just don’t think that translates well to a direct guilt for Cameron.
            He couldn’t have brought his movies to the screen if he didn’t work within this system.
            Of course now that he’s been successful, he could definitely donate his wealth.

            On the other hand, I could also donate all $50k of my life savings without starving, while others are currently starving.
            And I’m not going to do it. I carry the same type of guilt, only with lower numbers.

            • hissing meerkat@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Solidarity is working within the system. If he has the ability to negotiate that compensation for himself he can negotiate it for the other people working on the project instead, he just didn’t.