To the surprise of no one…

  • reabsorbthelight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 hours ago

    “Your honor, end to end encryption is a marketing term that we have trademarked and we would like to counter sue anyone using it”

  • tjoa@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    50 minutes ago

    I don’t know if they still do it but they actively gaslight you into believing you have e2e even with peers you have not scanned the public key of.

  • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Correct, WhatsApp fails to include a libre software license text file. We do not control it. So, it has never been secure.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      34 minutes ago

      Being FOSS is not a prerequisite of E2EE but a prerequisite of knowing it’s E2EE for sure. Like, I can give you a black box that prints PGP key pairs and says “includes RPGP, MIT-licensed PGP library” but you can’t trust that the machine doesn’t use modified, low-entropy RNG or exfiltrate the results. The communication you do with these PGP keys is technically E2EE − a third party server relaying your messages will not be able to read them, unless I provide them with the potentially not-so-secret “random” data my box generated.