Aside from the many obvious inconsistencies, I like to mention the main flaw in Noah’s ark being saltwater and freshwater fish. The flood was either fresh or salt, so one of those two types of fish would need to have been stored on the ark to survive. No mention of that, of course.
‘Aside from the many obvious inconsistencies’ were my first words.
The fish thing is something rarely considered and usually leaves dogmatic Christians with their mouth gaping like a fish for a moment as they try to think of an answer (of which there is none).
The Jehovah’s Witness guy in my work explained it away (or thought he did) by saying the fish that survived adapted. To which I said ‘You mean evolution?’
He, of course, said adaptation is not evolution. The hoop jumping continues.
Aside from the many obvious inconsistencies, I like to mention the main flaw in Noah’s ark being saltwater and freshwater fish. The flood was either fresh or salt, so one of those two types of fish would need to have been stored on the ark to survive. No mention of that, of course.
That’s the main flaw??
I humbly disagree.
‘Aside from the many obvious inconsistencies’ were my first words.
The fish thing is something rarely considered and usually leaves dogmatic Christians with their mouth gaping like a fish for a moment as they try to think of an answer (of which there is none).
The Jehovah’s Witness guy in my work explained it away (or thought he did) by saying the fish that survived adapted. To which I said ‘You mean evolution?’
He, of course, said adaptation is not evolution. The hoop jumping continues.
Actually, both types of fish species needed to be stored