This is literally just the r/nyt subreddit about The New York Times.

Given he apparently takes inspiration from Elon Musk, it’s only a matter of time until u/spez starts adding post view limits unless you pay extra.

  • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    If you install the duckduckgo browser and turn on app tracking protection, you’ll see just how much data is harvested from mobile apps, which is genuinely scary.

    This is why these sites are pushing the mobile app. It’s much harder to prevent trackers through an app than it is through a web browser.

  • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Someone should answer the phone because we all fucking called it.

    What’s next in the Reddit bingo?

    The removal of old reddit?

    Limiting the number of posts we can see per day as a normal user?

    Buy upvotes?

    The slippery slope logical fallacy doesn’t count when there is actual factual evidence.

    • Bobert@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The slippery slope is only a fallacy when you’re making leaps. To go from enacting exorbitant API fees to removal of old Reddit is a logical step so doesn’t make for a fallacy. Intent also plays a part for the same reason. If you can prove that enacting exorbitant API fees was for the purpose of restricting user access then limiting number of posts for users not logged in is a logical step. Slippery slope gets a bad rap but it can be a valid point and not a fallacy when done properly.

      • legion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        People get “slippery slope” wrong. Not every sequence of events is a slope.

        The idea of slippery slope is that one small action is said to kick off an unstoppable chain reaction. It doesn’t just mean that A leads to B. It means that A inevitably leads to B, even if it didn’t intend to, and B happening can’t be stopped once A happens. And maybe even the people that wanted A don’t want B but can’t stop it, because we’ve slipped and we’re sliding uncontrollably down the slope. That’s the whole concept, that we’re stuck sliding.

        Reddit doing one restrictive action, and then later choosing to do another restrictive action, probably doesn’t apply. There’s seemingly no slope, just an easily foreseeable sequence of events.

    • XYZinferno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Buy upvotes?

      The sad part is, I can absolutely see this happening. Not as an outright “gib money get updoot” but something more roudabout but effectively the same thing.

      “Be heard louder with Reddit Premium! Your comments on posts will be displayed closer to the top for others to see!”

      To reiterate, the above is just something I mocked up. May not be upvotes, but still rigging threads by paying Reddit money. I just wouldn’t be surprised at this point.

      • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s sort of what World of Warcraft did with gold.

        The gold farms were making TONS of money selling illegal gold in much the same way upvote farms are making a killing.

        Upvotes are free for them to give, and they would have a money printer on their hands.

  • hrxbfrnuructdny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m now only on lemmy and YouTube. Never got into tictok or Facebook, left and deleted reddit and Twitter. I’m in a happy place.

  • nostalgicgamerz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I called this happening right when Spez said he wanted to emulate elon. The other shoe has dropped

    I assume eventually all subreddits will be locked to non registered users on mobile…and PC