return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoMeta is ending its fact-checking program in favor of a 'community notes' system similar to Xwww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1308arrow-down17
arrow-up1301arrow-down1external-linkMeta is ending its fact-checking program in favor of a 'community notes' system similar to Xwww.nbcnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squareKusimulkku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoA lot of the time there’s a comment correcting the title or article at the top though. Pros and cons with that system.
minus-squarethemurphy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoThere is, but doesn’t explain why there’s more upvotes on the post than the comment. Most people would downvote the post after reading that comment, but it’s usually higher anyway. (and sometimes it’s not, I know)
minus-squareKusimulkku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoBecause people don’t go to the comments, they read the title on the front/subreddit page, sometimes vote and then move on.
minus-squarethemurphy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoExactly my point in my comment above the other.
A lot of the time there’s a comment correcting the title or article at the top though. Pros and cons with that system.
There is, but doesn’t explain why there’s more upvotes on the post than the comment. Most people would downvote the post after reading that comment, but it’s usually higher anyway. (and sometimes it’s not, I know)
Because people don’t go to the comments, they read the title on the front/subreddit page, sometimes vote and then move on.
Exactly my point in my comment above the other.