• yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Rent-seeking middlemen. This is the pinnacle of capitalism. Taking revenue while providing nothing is maximum efficiency. You can tell because it raises prices invisibly for everyone.

    This is just a baby version of how credit card companies have placed a 1%-5% sales tax on the global economy. You might say “at least the CC companies provide a service”, but that tax get’s added no matter if your using a CC or not.

  • SolaceFiend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    YSK the original creators of the Honey extension are the ones who designed it that way from the getgo. The important thing is they are also the creators of the new Pie AdBlock extension that is being prolifically advertised on YouTube. And the Pie extension does the same damn things as the Honey extension, despite being an ad blocker.

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I knew Honey was sketchy, but I just assumed it made it’s money from just data harvesting everything

  • derf82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So the TL:DW version seems to be that honey changes or adds an affiliate link to get a commission on the sale. Similar programs like Capital One Shopping probably do the same thing.

    Honestly, I don’t give a shit. I hate affiliate links no matter who gets them. They are the real scam.

    Sounds link the real solution is to use it to identify potential coupon codes. Then clear cookies, resign in, and enter the code yourself. But it’s not like that yields a cheaper price, so I’m not even sure I care.

  • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I am fine with them scamming influencers. I am not fine with them being paid by websites to not give the best deals

  • NotNotMike@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m glad this information is coming to light because I think that it should be fixed, at least as far as the affiliate link piece goes, but I find myself irritated by the sensationalism of the poster.

    They’re really pushing to make this seem as evil as possible, and milking it for every drop it’s worth. Making this a two-part series and not exposing it immediately feels super shitty to me.

    Just post the full information you have, if this is really so bad, stop trying to farm clips.

    Also, not enough focus on the timeline. Honey’s business model has changed dramatically since it was released long ago, and I feel like the part two video is going to complain about the original Honey business model, which was literally just a coupon code aggregator, just based on the “cliffhanger” at the end

    • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The dude spent a year figuring this out, researching and getting all his ducks in a row. What did you do, whats your contribution? Oh, let’s see, you bravely complained in a comments section about the way he chose to release the info, accusing him of the crime of sensationalism for clicks.

      Gee, why would he want to get paid for his work?? HOW SELFISH! It’s not like there are companies out there trying to steal content creator revenue, right??

      The way you complain more about him than the company, makes me wonder, do you work for Paypal, or that new project, Pie? Just weird to see you trying to make him look bad for wanting to get paid for his work. Sounds like a Honey thing to do.

      • NotNotMike@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        My guy take it down a notch, damn. I’m not calling for his head on a pike, I have legitimate and valid criticisms. I apologize if the tone came off more critical than I meant it but hot hell you came in spicy.

        But, to address your issue:

        Why does one wrong make a right? Why does him exposing the issue invalidate any criticisms or expectations of quality or integrity? To me it does not, hence why I criticize. And I even said I was glad the information is coming to light, and I’m grateful for him drawing attention to it, I just wish it could have been done a little more tactfully is all. I would like to have all the information right now, rather than waiting for a “part 2”.

        I also just don’t appreciate the stoking of anger, which has clearly worked. Ragebait is toxic and that’s what is being done with this story, from my perspective, so I don’t love it.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    as a consumer why should I care if I still get a discount ?

    isn’t this influencer back office bullshit and not my problem ?

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yep and a great question that allows more people to learn. Please stop downvoting real questions

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          People are downvoting the tone, not the question. Calling it bullshit when it is seriously stealing money from other human beings and calling it “not my problem” under the assumption that it doesn’t matter if it affects others, displays absolute lack of empathy. Devaluing the question and making it a bad faith comment.