You can have your distinction but I’m not making one. I’m not operating under that framework you setup. I’m saying something one thing and you’re trying to shoehorn in the conversation into some other thing.
For anyone following along, the original claim was, “I don’t understand the constant liberal need to assume everyone who disagrees with you is acting in bad faith,” and they responded “I see the same behavior with tankies,” then went on to talk about a completely different behavior and are now trying to pretend that that other behavior was the thing being discussed and not a completely irrelevant tangent they brought up to draw a false comparison.
I made it perfectly clear what kind of dismissive attacks I meant and even gave examples of I was talking about which you admitted to perpetrating, but you’re here splitting hairs and making petty demands so that you come out clean as if I care. And now you’re rewriting a thread from your POV in an attempt to win over people by insulting their intelligence while you’re thirsting for some insignificant victory in an inconsequential thread. Amusingly weird behavior, if you ask me. lol
And that’s not quite my point either, but ok. You’ve either not taken a moment to understand what I mean or you’re willingly misinterpreting it going after the low hanging fruit. Whichever it is, please stop trying to rewrite the thread. It’s quite disingenuous. Thanks.
For anyone following along, the original claim was, “I don’t understand the constant liberal need to assume everyone who disagrees with you is acting in bad faith,” and they responded “I see the same behavior with tankies,”
I mean, I see that behavior whether I disagree with them or not, and not because they’re tankies but because they’re people. It’s not the gotcha you think it is, honestly. lol
Also, quite the non-sequitur there. You’re really reaching for that win, huh. But you gotta reach harder.
For anyone following along, the original claim was, “I don’t understand the constant liberal need to assume everyone who disagrees with you is acting in bad faith,” and they responded “I see the same behavior with tankies,” then went on to talk about a completely different behavior and are now trying to pretend that that other behavior was the thing being discussed and not a completely irrelevant tangent they brought up to draw a false comparison.
I made it perfectly clear what kind of dismissive attacks I meant and even gave examples of I was talking about which you admitted to perpetrating, but you’re here splitting hairs and making petty demands so that you come out clean as if I care. And now you’re rewriting a thread from your POV in an attempt to win over people by insulting their intelligence while you’re thirsting for some insignificant victory in an inconsequential thread. Amusingly weird behavior, if you ask me. lol
Again, general “dismissiveness” is not what the conversation was ever about. Everyone dismisses certain viewpoints, I never disputed that.
And that’s not quite my point either, but ok. You’ve either not taken a moment to understand what I mean or you’re willingly misinterpreting it going after the low hanging fruit. Whichever it is, please stop trying to rewrite the thread. It’s quite disingenuous. Thanks.
“Rewriting the thread” by literally quoting exactly what was said.
That’s literally not what was said though. Lol
STOP REWRITING THE THREAD!!!1!!1!1!!
I mean, I see that behavior whether I disagree with them or not, and not because they’re tankies but because they’re people. It’s not the gotcha you think it is, honestly. lol
Also, quite the non-sequitur there. You’re really reaching for that win, huh. But you gotta reach harder.