To clarify, according to the paper, while intentionally assuming a human persona, it managed to fool most psychology undergraduates, not just random people.
weve had things beating the turing test since practically the 70s. it’s not a useful test unless your goal is to demonstrate the futility of testing this way, as turing largely intended.
To clarify, according to the paper, while intentionally assuming a human persona, it managed to fool most psychology undergraduates, not just random people.
weve had things beating the turing test since practically the 70s. it’s not a useful test unless your goal is to demonstrate the futility of testing this way, as turing largely intended.