I’m not religious personally but TGI Fridays is a very popular after-church spot (according to all of the religious/former religious people I asked). Why are none of them mad about this?

How could they actively support a restaurant so sinful it includes a sin in the title?

  • rah@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    the lords name

    I’m not religious

    Wut? If you’re not religious, why are you using the phrase “the lords name”?

    • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s a common thing religious people say “taking the Lords name in vain”. This is the thing people would call a sin. It wouldn’t be the same if phrased differently.

      • rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s a common thing religious people say

        Exactly. How come you’re saying it?

        • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          My question is about what people who actively use that phrase would be upset about. Someone who says the lords name would be upset about “the lords name” specifically.

          There’s a difference between being upset about some guy talking to some girl and being upset that your best friend John is flirting with your wife. The specific labels happen to matter even if they aren’t the terms I would use in any other circumstances.

          • rah@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Someone who says the lords name would be upset about “the lords name” specifically.

            But it’s not “the lord’s name” because it’s not “the lord”, it’s “their lord”. Why would you include yourself as a subject of Christians’ “lord”?

            • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zipOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              No but I would talk about Santa despite not believing him.

              This whole debate is stupid though… I used a very common phrase because it’s a common phrase that people use. That’s pretty much it. I’m done replying.

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Because it’s a common phrase and because one can accept that people have a name for their deity even if you believe that deity doesn’t really exist.