“A republic, if you can keep it.”

  • Vincent@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Sorry, you’re saying that if 85 percent of funding disappears (hundreds of millions), and “weird spending” (including the venture fund, which usually make money) to the tune of 0.3 million (let’s make that 2 million, assuming they have several such projects) is cut, then that would be able to sustain Firefox? Because that math doesn’t add up for me.

    • drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Google pays mozilla iirc around 400m a year, loosing 85% of that yeah, that sucks, sure. but yeah, there is enough to sustain firefox and thunderbird and some other things. If not, something is dreadfully wrong.

      • yoasif@fedia.ioOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The numbers you have quoted so far don’t make a dent in the 400M though - we haven’t even reached 1% yet. How much do you think Mozilla is spending on Firefox? How much of that is “extra” per your back of the envelope math?

        • drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Appologies, I am not a tax auditor, I don’t have enough spare time to go comb through mozilla’s finances to list out every single expense mozilla has. If mozilla can’t make do on that funding, they maybe they deserve to shut it’s doors for good afterall.

          • Vincent@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I don’t think there’s anyone on planet earth who can build a browser at a budget of, say, 2 million USD annually. See also: Ladybird and Servo not being anywhere near ready.