• atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Profit isn’t required to maintain a company. Only enough revenue to cover costs. Everything else is a surplus.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Profit would be appropriate if it were earmarked to offset difficult future fiscal periods, so that the business could continue to operate in lean times without having to punish employees through layoffs or failure to keep up with cost of living or cutting back on other benefits.

      But we all know that’s not what happens. Owners never have to experience consequences; customers and employees always do, for things that they have no control over.

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Absolutely, but I would even go as far as to say that things like rainy day funds or reinvestment should be considered costs of business not “things we might do with profit”.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Oh yeah, yeah - from a financial/reporting perspective, such a fund wouldn’t be considered “profit” in the strictest capitalist sense.

          If you consider that kind of fund to be for the benefit of customers and employees, it might be considered “socialist profit.” Capitalist profit serves the ownership class. Socialist profit serves labor and consumers.