There is a reason for USB-C extensions not to be part of the standard. They can be bothersome in the best case and dangerous in the worst.

  • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I have this cable: https://www.spigen.com/products/arcwire-usb-c-to-usb-c-cable-pb2202

    It’s 2 meters long, 240 watts and supports Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (40 gbps).

    I couldn’t test the 240 watts charging as I don’t have any device pulling more than 100 watts, but the Thunderbolt 4 part definitely works.

    Apple sells a 3 meter Thunderbolt 4 cable (albeit limited to 100 watts of power) that isn’t optical either (I think there’s some special circuitry in the plugs though).

    • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      You’re right. Those are active cables which I forgot to mention earlier that have special circuits that amplify signals, but are also a lot more expensive as a result.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        Will I get banned if I don’t call this person Margot Robbie, because they claim to identify as a famous Hollywood actress?