A new open-source Single Sign-On (SSO) provider designed to simplify user and access management.

Features:

  • 🙋‍♂️ User Management
  • 🌐 OpenID Connect (OIDC) Provider
  • 🔀 Proxy ForwardAuth Domains
  • 📧 User Registration and Invitations
  • 🔑 Passkey Support
  • 🔐 Secure Password Reset with Email Verification
  • 🎨 Custom Branding Options

Screenshot of the login portal:

    • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It does mean a form of provider lock-in, which is or can be its own issue. Also, while PostgreSQL is one of the best database engines out there among the FOSS stuff, it is verifiably and vastly overblown for stuff like “store a name and a email”, and I at least am not aware of any sort of “Postgres Lite” engines else I’d be using them at work.

      • illusionist@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        How does it lock you in? You, the admin, has full control over postgres. Sqlite has no security features. Does it store passwords? Sqlite also locks the database which is usually OK if there are no concurrent jobs. But for such services it sounds like a bad idea to use sqlite. (I am no server/app dev)

        • lime_red@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Sqlite shouldn’t lock for read, so unless you are writing something at each access, you can have thousands of concurrent reads. The Sqlite website spells this out, and lists its own self as the proof.

          This would mean you could not write logs to the database, you’d have to do it the unixy way and put logs in a text file.