General_Effort@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoOh My God, TAKE IT DOWN Kills Parodywww.techdirt.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1140arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1133arrow-down1external-linkOh My God, TAKE IT DOWN Kills Parodywww.techdirt.comGeneral_Effort@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square23fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·edit-22 months ago Your post does not cover CIVIL SUITS You’re the one who’s referring to criminal law: would immediately lose in court if trying to sure based on the existing laws The defense of “nuh-uh, he did it first” will simply not hold water in a court of law. Discovery does not work the way you think it does. I think you’re commenting on something you don’t understand, no offense.
minus-squarejust_another_person@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down6·2 months agoLaws still exist for civil suits. Next.
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-22 months agoOf course they do. That was my point. You’re the one acting like the law doesn’t apply to civil suits. Next.
You’re the one who’s referring to criminal law:
The defense of “nuh-uh, he did it first” will simply not hold water in a court of law.
Discovery does not work the way you think it does.
I think you’re commenting on something you don’t understand, no offense.
Laws still exist for civil suits.
Next.
Of course they do. That was my point. You’re the one acting like the law doesn’t apply to civil suits.
Next.